~Realistic expectations~ part 2.
14 Aug- Comments 10 Comments
- Categories Dating, Humor, Looks, Male/Female Relationships
10 Responses to “~Realistic expectations~ part 2.”
Leave a comment
Recent Posts
- Focus on the positive.
- Lori Gottlieb’s book and Christian maximizers.
- Boundless commenters can’t decide if it’s biblical for men to pursue women, unintentionally extend singleness for life.
- Pajama Boy of Boundless shames virgins for being proud they are virgins.
- Nobody knows what dating is anymore.
- Should Christians flirt at all?
- Blind dates and set-ups: yay or nay?
Recent Comments
- Dua F on Do people even want to date anymore?
- Roy K on Christians who don’t promote young marriage don’t actually care about chastity.
- Class Ninjas on The 10-point scale for female attractiveness.
- D on Rebecca St. James to marry Beefcake Missionary.
- Groups Guy on Rebecca St. James to marry Beefcake Missionary.
- Got dick? Wave it in their faces – A Voice for Men on Why women are afraid to pump up men’s egos.
- Groups Guy on Rebecca St. James to marry Beefcake Missionary.
- Groups Guy on Should Christians EVER go on dates with (presumed) non-Christians?
- John on Crush control.
- don on Rebecca St. James to marry Beefcake Missionary.
- cheryl on Prenups.
- Candace Lemming on Rebecca St. James to marry Beefcake Missionary.
- AllenPsype on “What if he’s just being nice?”
- RalphBuili on “What if he’s just being nice?”
- Young Marriage – oogenhand on Christians who don’t promote young marriage don’t actually care about chastity.
If you don’t see your comment:
- You posted too many links and got stuck in moderation. I approve these.
- You used a bogus email address and got caught in the spam filter. I delete these.

Epic cankles.
Haley –
“If men don’t care about fashion, then why do they complain so much about hipster garb and women who wear sweatpants and Uggs?”
Fashion = status through clothing. Dressing nicely does not equal fashion.
In her last two threads, Haley sure has a way of expressing the modern-day American SMV zeitgeist rather well in her drawings.
I actually feel bad for these two heavy folks; I guess because, with that kind of cluelessness, they’re bound to get hurt one day. And be taken by surprise.
Does she mean “hotties that want HER”?
Badger–
Epic cankles.
Cankles can’t stop a pretty face!
Langobard–
Thanks.
Jennifer–
I actually feel bad for these two heavy folks; I guess because, with that kind of cluelessness, they’re bound to get hurt one day. And be taken by surprise.
Hamsters are strong.
This is the dating market I know.
I don’t think it’s “the hotties”. It is “the quality men”. See my comment at the previous post.
Well, in black and white, the big chick looks cute :)
Again–very fun.
Also–I suspect imnobody is right–at least if we’re talking about long-term committed relationships and not one-night-stands. Men need to be “quality” not just good-looking.